Operators must improve governance in order to minimise Scope 3 emissions
Scope 3 carbon emissions commonly account for over 80% of large operators’ total carbon emissions. For most operators, 80–90% of those Scope 3 emissions come from upstream activities in the supply chain – mainly from Category 1 emissions (purchased goods and services) and Category 2 emissions (capital goods).1
Unfortunately, Scope 3 emissions produced across the entire value chain are also the most difficult and complex to assess, and the absence of emission transparency through multiple tiers of the supply chain is a huge concern. Many operators do not have the necessary governance structures in place, in terms of emissions, and hence have limited understanding and control in how Scope 3 emissions are generated. This impairs their understanding of the scale of the problem and dramatically impedes their ability to adopt optimal strategies for making reductions.
1 Scope 1 emissions: direct emissions from owned sources (for example, a company’s facilities, vehicles) as a result of the combustion of fuels (oils, natural gas, gasoline and diesel) on site.
Scope 2 emissions: indirect emissions from purchased energy, including electricity, heating, steam and cooling. Emissions are generated off-site and are purchased from utility companies or other suppliers.
Scope 3 emission: all other indirect emissions from a company’s value chain. These emissions come from both upstream activities (in the supply chain) and downstream activities (from the use and disposal of products and services by consumers).
Author

Grace Langham
Analyst, expert in sustainability and ESGRelated items
Article
Using dark fibre to track geothermal energy offers network providers an opportunity to monetise their assets
Survey report
Fixed operator energy benchmarks 2024
Survey report
Telecoms operator renewable energy benchmarks 2024